An EFCC Operative, Mohammed Goji, on Monday, told the Federal High Court, Abuja, that the commission did not conduct a thorough investigation into the defunct Pension Reformed Task Team (PRTT) headed by Abdulrasheed Maina to unravel members of the team drawn from other ministries, departments or agencies (MDAs) of government.
Goji, a member of the EFCC Pension Fraud Team that investigated alleged fraud by Maina, made the revelation during the continuation of cross examination before Justice Okon Abang as the 2nd prosecution witness (PW2) in the ongoing trial.
Goji on Dec. 16, 2019, told the court how Faisal Maina, son of Abdulrasheed Maina, withdrew N58 million from a commercial bank in the country.
Goji, a Principal Detective Superintendent with the anti-graft agency, at the resumed trial of Faisal on Monday, said he could not tell precisely other members of the PRTT constituted by the Federal Government then.
He stated this while responding to questions by Faisal’s lawyer, Adeola Adedipe.
When asked if Goji was a member of the PRTT led by Abdulrasheed Maina or any personnel from the anti-graft agency was a member, he said: “No, I was not a member of the Pension Reformed Task Team, and I can’t say if my agency was represented as part of the team.”
The official explained that while PRTT was designated at the office of the Head of Service of the Federation, “the EFCC’s Pension Fraud Team is designated at the EFCC office and is constituted only by EFCC operatives.”
When asked on those who constituted the PRTT, Goji said: “I can’t say authoritatively who exactly constitutes the Pension Reformed Task Team.
“I know some personnel of different agencies were constituted as part of PRTT but I have not seen an official document nominating such agencies’ personnel as part of the team.
“So, precisely, I cannot tell the agencies that participated in the PRTT,” he said.
Adedipe, in his cross examination, asked: “In other words, your investigation was not deeply rooted enough to reveal those agencies?”
Admitting, Goji said: “We did not conduct an in-depth investigation to find out precisely the members of the agencies represented in the defunct pension reformed task team.”
However, there was a mild drama when Adedipe refused to allow the EFCC witness offer further explanation on the questions he asked him.
“I cannot take this. No, no, you don’t need further explanation on this,” faisal’s lawyer said.
However, Justice Abang cautioned Adedipe, saying “Counsel, I am in charge and you cannot be using such language in the court.”
Adedipe, therefore, apologised thus: “I am sorry My Lord. I urge My Noble Lord not to entertain any further explanation.”
The judge later told the prosecution witness to always answer questions the way the question was asked.
“Answer questions the way it is asked and if you want to explain, seek the leave of the court and if it is relevant, I will record it.
“Your lawyer too is here to guide you,” Justice Abang said.
After so many questions from counsel to Faisal, the judge adjourned the matter till Jan. 21 for continuation of cross examination.
Faisal is being tried, alongside his father, on a three-count charge bordering on money laundering.