Connect with us

Economy

EU leaders ready to help May sell Brexit deal to parliament

Published

on

…As AFDB approves €7 million investment in Partech Africa Fund***

EU leaders are preparing to back Theresa May in building a “coalition of the reasonable” in the UK parliament, in a desperate bid to avoid a no-deal Brexit.

Following what has been described by diplomats as a “call for help” by the prime minister at a crunch summit in Brussels, the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, stressed that the EU had to pursue “all avenues” to find a deal that can get through the Commons.“I think where there is a will there is a way,” she said.

Jean-Claude Juncker, the European commission president, said: “It will be done.” He is understood to have told EU leaders that May needed “help” to sell a deal in parliament.

While ruling out major concessions, Emmanuel Macron, the French president, said it was clear that the roadblock to a deal did not lie in Brussels.

A potential agreement had been derailed on Sunday when Dominic Raab, the Brexit secretary, made an unscheduled visit to Brussels to inform the EU’s chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, that May could not get an agreement past her cabinet or the DUP, on whose votes her government relies.

Tory whips are now seeking to win over enough Labour MPs to outnumber hardline rebels, and are set to urge them to act in the “national interest” rather than risk the potentially severe economic consequences of no deal.

“It’s no longer a technical issue, it’s for the political ability of the UK to reach an agreement that can be presented to us,” Macron said. “Mrs May has been extremely committed and I’m convinced she will work in finding a political solution to get back to the EU negotiators.”

Under the EU’s plan to help May sell a deal, negotiations on an all-UK customs union are to be intensified, with a reference to future negotiations on its terms likely to be included in the withdrawal agreement.

Donald Tusk, the European council president, also said that EU leaders would wave through any request by the UK for an extension of the 21-month transition period.

They would do so in the hope that it will offer reassurance that the backstop solution, in which Northern Ireland remains in the customs union and single market as the rest of the UK withdraws, never comes to pass.

“If the UK decided that an extension of the transition period would be helpful to reach a deal, I am sure that the leaders would be ready to consider it positively,” Tusk said.

“This prolongation of the transition period probably will happen,” Juncker added. “It is a good idea. It is not the best idea the two of us had but it is giving us some room to prepare the future relationship in the best way possible.”

Tusk and Juncker refused to comment on the potential cost to the British taxpayer of a prolonged transition period – the prospect of which has sparked a furious backlash among Tory Brexiters.

But speaking at a press conference in Brussels, May seized on the positive comments of the EU leaders.

Asked whether the deadlock could be broken in time for a deal to be ratified in parliament, she said: “We’re intensifying the work on these issues that remain, and what I heard from leaders around the table, over the last hours since I have been around in Brussels yesterday, is a very real sense that people want that deal to be done.

“And I think if you look at some of the comments that have been made, Chancellor Merkel said, where there’s a will, there’s normally a way; Jean-Claude Juncker said let’s focus on the large areas where there is agreement.”

Brussels is continuing to insist on an “all-weather” solution in the withdrawal agreement that would keep Northern Ireland in the EU’s orbit should a trade deal or bespoke solution not be available by the end of the transition period in December 2020.

Following a meeting with May, the Irish taoiseach, Leo Varadkar, said the two leaders had been “in broad agreement” that the backstop insurance plan “would have to apply unless and until there is a new agreement between the EU and the UK to supersede it”, quoting wording used in a previous agreement between the EU and British government. “I was very reassured that the prime minister didn’t attempt in any way to row back on those commitments, which the UK made back in March.”

May’s promise of an open-ended backstop – an insurance plan to prevent the return of a hard border on the island of Ireland – will infuriate Brexiters and the DUP, who have threatened to remove their support for the government.

It is hoped, however, that a commitment within the withdrawal agreement to negotiating a customs deal along with the offer of a transition extension if required, can persuade Labour MPs, in particular, about the merits of a deal.

In a recent meeting with Jeremy Corbyn, Barnier told the Labour leader that nothing signed today on the future trade deal would tie his hands should there be a general election during a transition period.

Varadkar said: “We are all politicians and we do understand that May has to get a deal that she can get through Westminster.”

Juncker is understood have responded to May’s “nervous” 15-minute appeal on Wednesday evening by urging the leaders to “help” the prime minister, after she had spelled out the seriousness of her position at home.

A senior EU diplomat said that such were May’s nerves, Merkel had struggled to understand some of the address.

But EU officials have described the current hiatus in the negotiations since Sunday’s visit by Raab to Brussels merely as a “pause”, and stressed that they are acutely conscious of the political pressures May faces at home.

Asked whether she was confident of getting a deal to take back to parliament, given the lack of progress, May said: “There’s a real sense that what we’re doing is working to ensure that we can do this deal within a reasonable timetable. I’m very aware of the legislative requirements we have in the House of Commons and the period of time that will take.”

May’s political conundrum was underlined by the furious reaction back home to news that she is prepared to consider an extension to the post-Brexit transition period – aimed at allowing enough time for a UK-wide solution to be negotiated and implemented.

David Davis, the former Brexit secretary, said the idea was “unwise” and it was the wrong time to “take the pressure off” in the negotiations. European Research Group chair Jacob Rees-Mogg asked: “Why is this government so wet?”

Another former minister, Nick Boles, described any attempt to extend the transition period as a “desperate last move” and said May was losing the confidence of her party. He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Thursday that the EU was demanding “humiliating concessions”.

“I’m afraid she is losing the confidence now of colleagues of all shades of opinion, people who have been supportive of her throughout this process.”

The DUP’s deputy leader, Nigel Dodds, said an extension “offers nothing significant on the key issue of the unacceptable EU backstop proposals”.

In the meantime, the African Development Bank (AfDB) has  approved €7 million equity investment in Partech Africa Fund to  increase  investment funding to Africa’s entrepreneurs .

A statement from the bank said Partech is a Venture Capital Fund dedicated to investing in tech-enabled, innovative, high growth potential and talented entrepreneurs operating early stage companies and applying relevant technologies to address fundamental market constraints with potential to scale across the continent.

With hubs/offices in Dakar, Nairobi and planed for Lagos, the Fund is targeting nine Sub-Saharan African countries (South Africa, Ghana, Nigeria, Ivory Coast, Cameroun, Senegal, Tanzania, Kenya and Uganda).

According to the bank, the fund focuses on  financial inclusion,such as fintech, insurtech, pay as you go, off-grid energy as  online and mobile consumers.

The other areas are  tech adoption in enterprises ,especially in industry, education, logistics and transport, health, and agriculture value chain applications.

The  Fund successfully completed its first close in January  this year with €71 million and is targeting a total fund size of at least €100 million through a 2nd round expected to be closed by October/November this year.

Under the framework of the Boost Africa Programme, AfDB will provide  €7 million equity investment in the second close.  The contributions from both the African Development Bank and the European Investment Bank form part of the Boost Africa Programme, which assists Partech in its fund raising.  The Bank is expected to have a seat in the Advisory Board of the Fund.

The fund’s focus aligns well with the Boost Africa objectives to invest in high growth innovative start-ups with a strong social / Base of the Pyramid outreach and impact.

The investment strategy is also in line with the Bank’s Private Sector Operations strategy linking entrepreneurship, investment and economic growth with poverty alleviation and sustainable growth development outcomes and impact.

Guardian UK with additional report from The Nation

Economy

Import Licence: Dangote Refinery Seeks To Amend Suit Against NNPCL, Others

Published

on

…AYM Shafa, A. A. Rano Limited and Matrix Petroleum in their response averred that the plan to monopolise the oil sector is a recipe for disaster 

The Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals FZE has sought to amend its suit against the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) and others.

The plea to amend the suit followed an application by the NNPCL before Justice Inyang Ekwo of a Federal High Court in Abuja, urging the court to strike out the case for being incompetent.

The Dangote Refinery had sued Nigeria Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) and Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPCL) as 1st and 2nd defendants; and also listed as 3rd to 7th defendants respectively in the originating summons, marked:  FHC/ABJ/CS/1324/2024 and dated Sept. 6, were AYM Shafa Limited, A. A. Rano Limited, T. Time Petroleum Limited, 2015 Petroleum Limited, and Matrix Petroleum Services Limited.

The oil company, through its lawyer, Ogwu Onoja, SAN, prayed the court to nullify import licences issued by NMDPRA to the NNPCL and the five other companies to import refined petroleum products.

The company (plaintiff) also prayed the court to declare that NMDPRA violated Sections 317(8) and (9) of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) by issuing licenses for the importation of petroleum products.

It stated that such licenses should only be issued in circumstances where there is a petroleum product shortfall.

It equally sought N100 billion in damages against NMDPRA for allegedly continuing to issue import licences to NNPCL and the five companies for importing petroleum products.

But the NNPCL (2nd defendant), in its preliminary objection dated and filed Nov. 15, urged the court to strike out the suit.

It argued that the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPC) sued by the refinery was a non-existent entity.

The company, through its lawyer, Kehinde Ogunwumiju, SAN, said the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL), being its registered name with the Corporate Affairs Commission, is not the same as the 2nd defendant sued by the plaintiff.

It further argued that the court lacked jurisdiction over the 2nd defendant sued Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPC).

“A simple search on the CAC website shows that there is no entity called ‘Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPC),’” the 2nd defendant said.

The NNPCL, therefore, said that the 2nd defendant, as sued by the refinery in the instant suit, is not a competent party or a juristic person, urging the court to strike out its name or the suit in its entirety.

Meanwhile, the Dangote Refinery, in a motion on notice dated Nov. 25 but filed Nov. 28 by Onoja, sought an order, granting leave to the company to amend its originating summons in accordance with the rules of the court.

The refinery, in a copy of the motion sighted on Monday, said this would allow it to correct the name of the 2nd defendant to read; “Nigerian National Petroleum  Company Limited,” instead of “Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPC)” earlier listed.

In the affidavit in support of the motion deposed to by Vincent Sani, a litigation clerk in the law firm of Onoja, he said he was informed by one of their lawyers, Innocent Adoo, on Nov. 25 that after the filing of the originating processes in the suit, he observed that the 2nd defendant’s name was erroneously spelt, hence, the need for the amendment.

Sani averred that the said amendment had become necessary in order for the record of the court to bear the proper description of the 2nd defendant (NNPCL) as a party in the suit.

The litigation clerk said that the NNPCL was yet to be served with the said originating processes sought to be amended.

According to him, the proposed amended originating summons, affidavit in support and written address, are hereby exhibited and marked as “Exhibit A.”

Sani, who averred that the defendants/respondents would not be prejudiced if the application was granted, said that justice would be better served if their plea is considered.

However, observes that the proposed originating summons, filed on Nov. 28 and dated Sept. 6, seeks the same relief as the earlier filed by the refinery.

It would be recalled that three oil marketers had also prayed the court to dismiss suit.

The oil marketers, in a joint counter affidavit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1324/2024 filed on Nov. 5 in response to Dangote Refinery’s originating summons, told Justice Ekwo that granting that application would spell doom for the country’s oil sector.

According to them, the plan to monopolise the oil sector is a recipe for disaster in the country.

The three marketers; AYM Shafa Limited, A. A. Rano Limited and Matrix Petroleum Services Limited, in their response, said the plaintiff did not produce adequate petroleum products for the daily consumption of Nigerians.

Besides, they argued that there was nothing placed before the court to prove the contrary.

Justice Ekwo had fixed Jan. 20, 2025, for report of settlement or service.

Continue Reading

Economy

Glasses Clink, Encomiums Pour As Dangote Refinery Terminal Marks One Year Of Operation

Published

on

Glasses Clink, Encomiums Pour As Dangote Refinery Terminal Marks One Year Of Operation

…Handles 250 tankers amidst inadequate Tugboats

Wine glasses are clinking and encomiums pouring in Lekki today, as the Dangote Petroleum Refinery Oil Terminal [Offshore SPMs], proudly celebrates one year of nonstop operations, since welcoming its first Tanker berthing, MT ST NNENE.

The giant vessel, a Gas Oil/diesel laden Ship, according to the Maritime First, enjoys the historical status of being a first tanker caller, at Dangote terminal.

Between then and today, Saturday, December 7th, 2024, the terminal has handled not fewer than 250 tanker- ships.

Though it was difficult getting to speak with Dangote Group image maker, Chiejina, a source who craved anonymity told the Maritime First that management was sincerely thankful to God, for all that the terminal had achieved, within one year.

“We extend our heartfelt gratitude to everyone who has contributed to this remarkable journey and made it so rewarding”, the source stated further, adding:

“As we look ahead, we anticipate even busier times and aim to achieve even greater milestones”, while thanking both Team Dangote and all its supporters for being a part and parcel of the success story!

“Operations are popping up every day”, he said, stressing that the terminal’s activities had been so impactful that it was already helping to strengthen the Naira, against the Dollar; with a soaring probability of truly assisting to lure more Dollars into the country.

“This is a big achievement. It is helping the Nigerian Ports Authority NPA to prove it is capable of doing all of which the International Oil Companies IOCs had thought it was incapable of”,

“Dangote is not only taking over the Nigerian market, it will soon take over the West African route too”, he further told the Maritime First.

Zeroing on the operational aspect, the source praised the NPA, for the great way it has handled the growing vessel traffic around the Lekki Deep-sea Port.

He however stressed the fact of infrastructure inadequacy, citing tugboats as one good example.

“We are eyeing a minimum of 17 tankers of varying sizes, monthly. Even this morning, three tankers sailed in between 3.00 am and 4.00 am. Two came with crude and the third had products. Do you know what toll such takes on tugboats?

“So, there’s no gainsaying the fact that NPA needs more tugboats over there than it does, presently!”, he stated further, noting that the authority has currently deployed just a few of its several tugboats around there.

Every effort to obtain an official reaction from the Nigerian Ports Authority NPA proved abortive as the authority’s image maker, Ikechukwu Onyemakara woefully failed to pick up his calls.

,

Continue Reading

Economy

1 Hour Flight Costs Over N14m – Air Peace

Published

on

1 Hour Flight Costs Over N14m – Air Peace

The airline’s Chief Operating Officer (COO),  Mrs Oluwatoyin Olajide, disclosed this at a news conference on Friday in Lagos.

Olajide said that N7 million is required to purchase 4,000 litres of jet A1 (aviation fuel), which is currently sold for N1,400 per litre.

She added that for Aircraft, Crew, Maintenance and Insurance (ACMI), the airline spends about 4,000 dollars for a one-hour flight.

According to the COO, N5 million is required for every one-hour flight, a figure significantly higher than what operators’ counterparts pay globally.

“There are factors that define operating cost and they include aviation fuel which takes between 60 per cent to 65 per cent of the operating cost.

“One litre of fuel is N1,400. If I have to operate a one-hour flight from here to Abuja, Port Harcourt, Owerri, I am going to be using about 4,000 litres of fuel.

“So, on average, a one-hour flight costs N7 million on fuel alone. Also, ACMI costs 4,000 dollars for leasing planes, considering the challenges we are currently facing,” Olajide said.

She explained that, on average, operating a one-hour flight costs N7 million, with an additional N7 million for fuel, bringing the total to N14 million.

She noted that insurance for a one-hour flight costs an additional N5 million.

L-R: The Chairman of Air Peace Ltd., Dr Allen Onyema, and the Chief Operating Officer, Air Peace, Mrs Oluwatoyin Olajide, at a news conference held on Friday in Lagos.

“For financing, we pay about 30 per cent to borrow money, while foreign airlines pay around three per cent. Also, Nigerian airlines pay four times more than others for spare parts,” she added.

According to Olajide, given the operating costs of Nigerian airlines, it is not easy to operate with the current airfares.

She emphasised that a one-hour trip within Nigeria should cost no less than N500,000.

Speaking on the recent report of fare exploitation, Olajide said that the allegation had cost the airline a major international slot.

She also clarified that the Federal Consumer and Customer Protection Commission (FCCPC) only invited the airline for enquiry and not an investigation as reported by some media.

She said that the Chairman of the Airline, Dr Allen Onyema, honoured the invitation.

She, however, said that FCCPC could have directed the enquiry to the Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA), the regulator of the airline.

Olajide recalled the airline’s selflessness during COVID-19, Xenophobia and the evacuation of stranded Nigerians from foreign countries at no cost.

It was also recalled that the FCCPC had on Dec. 2 written to the airline, inviting them for an enquiry on the complaint of fare exploitation.

The FCCPC later clarified that it was not investigating the airline but rather an enquiry, contrary to reports circulated in the media

Continue Reading

Editor’s Pick

Politics