Connect with us

crime

Lowering criminal age limit to 13 in line with global trend- Yoon

Published

on

Lowering criminal age limit to 13 in line with global trend- Yoon
….As Court remands Student for alleged Robbery, Cultism***
South Korean President, Yoon Suk-yeol, on Thursday, said the decision to lower the age of criminal responsibility to 13 was intended to reflect the global trend.
On Wednesday, the Justice Ministry announced the measure of wanting to revise the criminal and juvenile laws to be able to convict youths of crimes from the age of 13.
Currently, minors under the age of 14 cannot be convicted of a crime and are referred to community service programmes or youth correction institutions if they commit an offence.
Yoon told reporters as he arrived for work that “from the parent’s perspective, they may think their child is at risk of receiving strong punishment.
“On the other hand, from the perspective of the victims or those who feel at risk of falling victim to a crime, they may think it’s too soft.
“When it comes to human rights, the rights of the offender are important, but the rights of the victim or potential victim are also important, so we decided to take a step that is in line with the global trend,” he said.
On why the age was lowered to 13 and not his campaign pledge of 12, Yoon said the government carried out a statistical review and decided to start by lowering the limit by one year.
“The serious crimes that are judged to be difficult to prevent with two years under the protection of a youth correction institution are happening a lot among 13- and 14-year-olds, so for now we’ll try enforcing it by lowering it to 13,” he said.
 In another development, a Makurdi Magistrates’ Court on Thursday ordered that a student, David Terhemba, be remanded in a correction centre for alleged armed robbery and cultism.
Magistrate Ajuma Igama, who did not take the plea of the suspect for want of jurisdiction, subsequently adjourned the matter until Nov. 23, for further investigation.
Earlier, the Prosecution Counsel, Insp Stella Ngbede told the court that the case was reported by Ogah Joshua, Samuel Alexander and Dada Abdulkarim.
She said the complainants reported that Terhemba and two others broke into their houses and robbed them at gunpoint.
The prosecution said Terhemba and accomplices stole one L.G Plasma Tv 42-inches, one JVC television, one iPhone 6x, Infinix S4 and Tecno Spark 8c.
She said that the stolen items were recovered from the suspect except for the Tecno Spark 8c.
Ngbede also said that investigation into the matter was still ongoing and prayed the court for an adjournment.
She said the offence contravened the provisions of sections 6(b), 1(1)(2)(a)(b) of the robbery and firearms special provision act 2004 and Section 11 of the Abduction, Hostage-Taking, Kidnapping, secret cult and similar activities prohibition laws of 2017.
– Yonhap
Continue Reading
Advertisement Simply Easy Learning
Click to comment

crime

Auxiliary’, Chairman Oyo park system, gets Feb. 27; 4 others docked over Police-Assault in Ibadan

Published

on

Auxiliary’, Chairman Oyo park system, gets Feb. 27; 4 others docked over Police-Assault in Ibadan

A Chief Magistrates’ Court in Ibadan adjourned the trial of chairman of the disciplinary committee of the Park Management System (PMS), Alhaji Mukaila Lamidi, aka Auxilliary, Mukaila Lamidi, 61, (aka Auxilliary) until April 27.

Lamidi was docked on Nov 17, 2022, for the alleged destruction of billboards of candidates of the All Progressives Congress (APC) worth N4.2 million.

The court did not seat on Thursday and no reason was given by the registrar.

All counsel in the matter agreed on the April 27 adjourned date.

He is charged with six counts bordering on conspiracy, unlawful damage and breach of public peace.

The Prosecution Counsel, ASP Sunday Fatola, said that the defendant and others at large allegedly conspired to commit the offence.

The police alleged that the defendant, on Nov. 13, at Igboora, at about 6.50 p.m., wilfully and unlawfully damaged APC billboards bearing the pictures of the party’s presidential, governorship and House of Representatives candidates, valued at N1.2 million.

The prosecution said on Nov. 13, at about 11.00 a.m. at Ido, in Omi-Adio Magisterial Area, Lamidi allegedly conspired with others to wilfully and unlawfully damage APC billboard, bearing the picture of Aderemi Oseni, the party’s House of Representatives candidate worth N3 million.

He said that the offence contravened the provisions of sections 249 (d), 451 and 517 of the Criminal Code Laws of Oyo State, 2000.

The Chief Magistrate, Mr Taiwo Oladiran, had admitted the defendant to bail in the N500,000 with two sureties in like sum.

In another development, four persons, Mohammed Omobonike, 45, Abdulahi Akewula, 33, Idowu Basit, 25 and Alimat Muhammed, 18, were on Thursday, arraigned in an Iyaganku Magistrates’ Court Ibadan for allegedly assaulting police officers.

The defendants, whose residential addresses were not provided, were charged with serious assault and assault occasioning harm.

The Prosecutor, Mr Philip Amusan told the court that the defendants allegedly committed the offence on Jan. 31, at 4. 30 p.m., around Idi-Ayunre road, Ibadan.

Amusan alleged that the four accused persons and others at large unlawfully assaulted Insp. Edalere Samusideen of the Iyaganku police station Ibadan and caused him serious bodily harm.

The prosecutor said that the defendants on the same date and place also allegedly assaulted another police officer, Sgt. Rufus Adewuyi and caused him harm.

He said the offence contravened Section 356(2) of the Criminal laws of Oyo State, 2000.

The defendants, however, pleaded not guilty to the charge.

The Magistrate, Mrs O. A Akande granted the defendants bail in the sum of N50, 000 and one surety each in like sum.

She adjourned the case until March 3, for hearing.

Continue Reading

crime

Accountant tells court how CEO, Amaechi Ndili, Wife allegedly converted $4.7m

Published

on

Accountant tells court how CEO, Amaechi Ndili, Wife allegedly converted $4.7m

… Case adjourned till Jan. 31 for continuation of trial***

An accountant, on Monday, told an Ikeja Special Offences Court how the chief executive officer of Lionstone Offshore Services Ltd. and his wife allegedly converted $4.7 million to their personal use.

The accountant, Mr Godwin Okon, testified against Amaechi Ndili and his wife, Njide, who are facing a three-count charge bordering on stealing and fraudulent conversion of money to personal use.

The couple, however, pleaded not guilty.

Okon, also a business analyst, told the court that the defendants entered into a contract with Hercules Offshore Nig. Ltd.

According to the witness, after executing the contract, the defendants converted part of the proceeds to their personal use.

The witness was led in evidence by ACP Simon Lough (SAN).

He said that Addax Petroleum Development Nigeria had a contract with Lionstone Offshore Services Ltd., which was executed by Hercules based on an agreement jointly written on Jan. 14, 2010.

“Sometime in December 2009, Amaechi came to Hercules to discuss the possibility of collaboration between the two companies to team up and carry out some contracts in the Nigeria oil and gas field.

“The first defendant had based his reason on the expertise and experience of Hercules company, and by Jan. 14, 2010, a joint bidding agreement was entered into and some terms were spelt out,” he said.

The witness told the court that Lionstone was responsible for the submission of tenders and receiving of payments, while Hercules was responsible for providing technical information and financial information.

He said: “Some other joint bidding agreements were fees spelt out.

“Lionstone will be entitled to a one-time flat fee of $75,000 on the execution; then an annual amount of $150,000, for three years.

“The contract was entered into by Lionstone and  Addax in October 2010, but it was executed by Hercules based on an agreement.

“When there is payment, the payment will go to the Lionstone account; then, Lionstone, on receiving such the amount, will remit the net amount after taking two per cent.

“Lionstone paid the invoices from Addax from the inception of the execution of the contract, up till June 2012, to Hercules.

“From July 2012 to September 2013, Lionstone did not remit any money again.

“Based on the invoices, after Lionestone had failed to remit the money to Hercules and after making calls and nothing happened, our senior management went to Addax to inquire, and it was from there that we were told that Addax had paid all the invoices to Lionstone and that they were not owing Lionstone any money,” the witness said.

The police had on Oct. 19, 2022, arraigned the couple alongside Lionstone Offshore Services Ltd. on a three-count charge.

The couple, however, pleaded not guilty to the charge.

The police alleged that the defendants committed the offences from July 2012 to September 2013  at Lionstone Offshore, off A58 Road 2, Victoria Garden City, Lagos State, and Lionstone Offshore Services Ltd. at No. 38/39 Bull Plaza 19, Floor Marina, Lagos.

The alleged offences contravene Sections 516, 387 of the Criminal Code, Laws of the Federation, 2004.

Justice Olubummi Abike-Fadipe adjourned the case until Jan. 31 for continuation of trial.

Continue Reading

crime

Court approves eligibility of ICPC witness in N10m bribery case against LG chairman

Published

on

Court approves eligibility of ICPC witness in N10m bribery case against LG chairman

Officials of the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC) can stand as prosecution witnesses in bribery cases, an FCT High Court ruled on Monday.

Justice Peter Kekemeke gave the ruling in a N10 million bribery suit filed against former Chairman of Gwagwalada Area Council, Malam Adamu Danze.

The ICPC had charged Danze with six counts of demanding N10 million kickbacks from a contractor handling construction projects in the area council.

It alleged that in March 2018, Danze demanded a N10 million bribe from the contractor handling the construction of a double-cell culvert at Paiko-Kore (Gwagwalada).

It alleged that the defendant demanded that the director, Remotosh Construction Ltd., Mr. Aremu Omotosho, should transfer the money to the counsel handling his election petition matter.

ICPC stated that the offence contravened the provisions of sections 10(a), 18(d), and 19 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000.

Danze pleaded not guilty to the allegations.

His defense counsel, Mr. Abdul Mohammed (SAN) had on July 7, 2002, argued before the court that an ICPC official was not eligible to stand as a prosecution witness in the case.

Justice Kekemeke ruled on Monday, however, that by virtue of Section 175 (1) of the Evidence Act, the witness is eligible to testify.

Section 175 (1) of the Evidence Act states that: “all persons shall be competent to testify unless; the court considers that they are prevented from understanding the question put to them.

He added that the witness was in court to tender documents that were already in the public domain and had not said anything before the lawyer’s objection.

Kekemeke further challenged the defense counsel to provide the relevant law which stated that the witness was not eligible to testify.

The judge adjourned the case to March 2 for continuation of trial after Danze’s lawyer prayed the court for the adjournment because his principal was not in court.

In March 2022, ICPC’s counsel, Mr. Michael Adesola presented the second prosecution witness Ms. Mutayo Idoku who happened to be a lawyer from the law chambers that handled Danze’s election petition matter.

Mohammed, the defendant’s lawyer opposed the move, saying that the witness could not give evidence in the matter by virtue of section 192 (1) of the Evidence Act.

The section states that: “no legal practitioner shall at any time be permitted, unless with his client’s express consent to disclose any communication and for the purpose of his employment as such legal practitioner by or on behalf of his client.’’

He promised to provide relevant literature and a written submission on whether or not Idoku could give evidence in the matter.

Continue Reading

Advertisement

Editor’s Pick

Politics